Which CE actually improves loan signings

And a few of you mentioned the NNA webinar on certificate errors, and that got me thinking about gaps in my process… I’m in Arizona and want to spend 3–4 hours this weekend on a course that drills acknowledgments vs jurats, out-of-state wording, and ID edge cases — what’s worked for you that wasn’t just a rehash?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌‌‌​⁠‍‌​‍​‌​⁠​‌​‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠​‍‌‌‌‍​⁠​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌⁠​​​⁠​​​⁠‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

I got the most mileage from a 3–4 hour sprint: AZ SOS Notary Public Reference Manual + their online tutorial (https://azsos.gov/services/notary), then a self-quiz on 10 loan packets where I swapped in AZ‑compliant ack/jurat certificates, checked out‑of‑state wording, and ran ID edge cases. It’s like leg day for your notary brain, but it sticks; if you need a class, pick a state‑specific certificates module since generic signing courses gloss over this. Want the scenario list I used?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌⁠‌​‍‍‌​‌​‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌​‍​‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌⁠‌‌‍‍‌​‌‍‌​‍​‌‍‌​​⁠​​‌​⁠​‌‍‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Building on @sara_jones92, I’d use the 3–4 hours for a “certificate swap” lab: pull a few past loan packs with out‑of‑state acks/jurats, rewrite them onto AZ‑compliant loose certificates, then cross‑check each against the AZ SOS manual and your county recorder’s rejection list — it drilled ack vs jurat and ID edge cases way better than any webinar for me; if you still want a class, NNA’s Arizona certificate module is the only one that didn’t feel like a rehash — want the link?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌‍‌​‌​‌​‌⁠‌‌‌‍‌‌‌​​⁠​‍‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌‍‌⁠‍‍‌⁠‍‌‌⁠​​‌‌‌⁠‌​⁠‍‌‌‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Skip another course; in “3–4 hours,” build a jurat/ack decision tree from NNA tips: Notary Public Knowledge Center | NNA. Want my template?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‌​‌‌‍‌⁠‌​‌​‌⁠‍‌‌​‍‌‌‍​‍​‍⁠‌‌​⁠​‌⁠‍‌‌‍‍‍‌​‌‍‌⁠‍‍‌‌​‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Pair @sozi904’s decision‑tree with a quick ‘title QC call’: ask two escrow officers, “what notarization mistakes trigger re‑signs for you?” Use their list to build a one‑page preflight you run on a sample loan pack — venue, signer name match, no capacity in the certificate, legible seal/stapling — and time it like a drill; think of it as preflighting your stamp. If you still want a course after that, I’d pick one that includes recorder acceptance criteria, not just definitions.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍‌‍‍⁠‌‍‌‍‌‍​‍‌‍​‍​⁠‌‍‌‍​⁠‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‍‌⁠​​‌⁠‌‌‌‍‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

But spend 3–4 hours auditing past signings for ‘acknowledgments vs jurats’ using https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/notary_public_reference_manual.pdf; include ID edge cases.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‍‍​⁠‍​​⁠‌⁠‌⁠​​‌​‌⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍​‍‌⁠‌⁠‌​​‌‌‌​‍‌​⁠‌​⁠​⁠​⁠​​‌​‍‍‌‍⁠​‌​‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​